|
||
|
|
|
Reports & Statements | Working Groups | Photos from the Halifax Conference | Schedule 53rd Pugwash Conference on Science and World
Affairs
Report on Working Group 6 Mitigation of Global Environmental Change Omar Masera (Canada) and Kit Hill (UK) [Co-Conveners] David Sandomierski (Canada) [Rapporteur]
Under continuation of recent trends, we can expect, by 2100, a tripling of pre-industrial levels of atmospheric carbon dioxide, with a quadrupling almost unavaoidable thereafter. That world would be a "scorched earth:" unbearably high surface air temperatures, severe drought conditions, dramatic change in ocean levels, and irretrievable loss of biodiversity. Global Climate Change is primarily a human-induced phenomenon. In the past fifty years, climate models which combine natural processes with human intervention correlate extremely well with temperature records. Levels of consumption, the carbon intensity of energy sources and processes such as deforestation and land degradation all determine atmospheric CO2 levels. Reforestation can reduce CO2 and has local benefits but cannot be relied upon alone to abate global climate change. Stabilization of global population will help. For example, in countries where universal free education has been extended, especially to women, fertility rates are lower. One possible solution is to reduce population growth rates through education. However, it is the high energy consumption on behalf of the developed world which is most urgent. Carbon-based fuels contain hidden subsidies that artificially lower their cost, placing a barrier to renewable energy sources. Wind and solar energy are too intermittent to provide adequate base loads of electricity. For many countries, the main alternative to coal, whose carbon emissions are extremely high, remains nuclear power. In that sense, countries may need to consider keeping the nuclear option open providing issues such as nuclear proliferation, vulnerability to terrorist attacks and the safe disposal of nuclear waste are solved. The widespread move to renewable energy sources, while desirable, requires a thorough economical and technological assessment. Despite these difficulties, it is urgently important that mitigation strategies are not sacrificed in favour of adaptation strategies. Whereas the cost of mitigation will be borne largely by rich countries, poor countries bear the brunt of adaptation measures. Further, climate change information risks becoming commoditized and sold to the highest bidder, giving preferential access to those least in need. Early knowledge about climatic events, for example, can enable rich farmers to exhaust the supply of drought-resistant seeds. Focus upon adaptation, which is dependent upon access to scientific data, can drive a wedge deeper between rich and poor. Many areas of the world are already facing dwindling water resources. Given the high prevalence of transboundary water systems, nations must cooperate through water sharing and joint management in order to avert water-based conflicts. Concurrently, nations must balance their needs for capital investment with an affirmation that water is a universal human right. Governments must distinguish between different uses of water so that water for basic survival purposes is not commoditized. On the one hand, large scale projects such as dams and industrial irrigation can provide sophisticated technological solutions to water problems. On the other hand, water management at the individual level - such as collecting rainwater and using backyard filtration systems - can vastly increase water yields. The imposition of inappropriate water technologies can undermine social cohesion. Managers of local water resources should weigh the high legitimacy of small-scale, individual efforts against the technological advantage of large-scale projects. Traditional knowledge has much to offer science. For example, oral accounts by the indigenous inhabitants of Canada's Arctic region can provide researchers with information about climate change for which there is no numerical data. An appreciation of complexity and ambiguity challenges the administrative mind which tends to artificially compartmentalize problems into narrow parts. Technological fixes are no panacea but must rather be seen as part of a bigger picture. A "sustainability" paradigm should inform responses to the global environmental threat. A shift towards this paradigm must be achieved through the "ultimate" drivers of society: our values and needs, our knowledge and understanding, our power structures and our culture. The participation of a number of different actors, termed "Governance," can accomplish this goal better than the more limited conception of government. Support for governance initiatives can be bolstered by research into, and education about, the ultimate drivers of society. Is sustainability an appropriate conception for Pugwash to adopt? We are familiar with the Russell-Einstein manifesto of 1955. As one participant in our group suggests, however, it may be appropriate to reformulate the manifesto to address the pressing needs of today:
The words of TS Eliot give us sober pause to reflect upon the changing nature of our world: "This is the way the world ends/ Not with a bang but with a whimper." Human security today is threatened by nuclear proliferation. But we have more to fear than the big bang. The whimpers contained in the warnings of environmental exhaustion threaten our security just as much. Pugwash can, and should, assist in bolstering support for sustainable development world wide. This can be achieved without undermining Pugwash's esteemed position in the intellectual and political communities. Pugwash can lend support to organizations at the local, national and international levels by commissioning scientific studies whose findings would be accessible to specialists and generalists alike. This working group urges individuals in Pugwash to contribute to the following initiatives:
|